Intellectual Property Law

Submitted by: Marionlj Maynard

First, it is very important that your law firm logos is unique compared to your competitor. If you take a look at most law practice logos, they are very similar to each other. Quite a few of these law logos use typical and common symbols of law such as balance scales and judge gavels. At first, it makes sense to use such symbols but in doing so, you are not separating yourself from your competition. In fact, you are sending the message that you area “typical” law firm. Try using other symbols of law which are not as common or using a symbol which is not directly related to law such as a “shield” which is a symbol of protection or a “tiger” which is a symbol of strength.

Profiting online from reselling rights is quite easy by simply repackaging it; including more products and raising the value of the package, which in turn increases the price. While selling the product, you could also add an offer related to the product, to sell for an additional price. You need to be more creative if you continue to sell tired old packages. Since you own the right, you are free to get any individual item from those packages and put them in your own creation. While repackaging the product you have to make it unique, fresh and different.

Not being able to work due to an injury that occurred while on the job is not what any employee or employer wants to happen. Understanding one’s workers compensation rights is beneficial so that in the event that a mishap does occur, the financial compensation process will be less stressful and move at a quicker pace. Having an attorney, if needed, who can help with getting the most from workers compensation rights for either the employee or employer is key to a successful case for everyone.

YouTube Preview Image

Shop around for the best price and experience that you can find in a software license drafter. Remember, when you are given rights for free and have something that is protectable as a property – even if it is not physical property – you should always ensure that you are covering your bases and not relinquishing anything that you may later want to enforce or sell. A software license agreement will help you do this.

These phrases are therefore usually just assumed or, worse yet, just plain fudged. Anyone who suggests that these phrases alone are already self-defining, would be wrong. Accordingly, anyone, including a publishing lawyer or paralegal representing a book publisher or entertainment lawyer representing a studio or producer, who says that an author should do – or not do – something in the realm of the “electronic right” or “digital right” because it is “industry-standard”, should automatically be treated with suspicion and skepticism.

Up to now, this article discussed how phrases like the “digital right” or “electronic right” should not be assumed to be self-defining, even by and between publishing lawyers and entertainment attorneys, and how it is incumbent upon authors to reserve needed rights like the digital right or the electronic right to themselves in the context of a publishing deal. Next up, let’s examine concepts such as the digital right or electronic right from the perspective of the publishing lawyer and entertainment attorney, and the standpoint of fairness – who between author and publisher should in fact hold on to the digital right and electronic right, once and assuming that they are first properly defined?

An author may think that small “portfolio” uses (e.g., tucked inside greeting cards, on an author’s personal web site, etc.) are so minor, that they will never compete with publishing rights granted for the same work, and may tell the publisher or the company’s publishing lawyer or entertainment attorney as much. The greeting card example does seem innocuous enough, but the publisher and its entertainment or publishing lawyer will likely not agree with the author regarding the author’s personal web site. It is the electronic right or the digital right that really scares publishers and their publishing lawyers and entertainment attorneys, and is perceived as threatening to their long-term investment in the author and his or her work.

And this makes sense. Look at it from the perspective of copyright enforcement – from the perspective of the New York entertainment attorney litigator trying to prove or disprove copyright infringement in a court of law downtown at 500 Pearl Street. How difficult would the job be of a federal judge or jury in a U.S. copyright infringement litigation in the Southern or Eastern Districts of New York, or that of a U.S. Copyright Office Examiner in Washington, D.C., if the U.S. Congress allowed all of us to claim copyright in the inchoate and evanescent? The courts in New York and indeed nationwide would be inundated with strike suits and other spurious copyright claims, perhaps more often brought by pro se litigants rather than their entertainment lawyers if any. Therefore, Congress doesn’t let us get away with it. Congress requires reduction to a “tangible medium of expression” as a pre-condition for copyright protection. But no, Congress does not require copyright registration as a pre-condition to copyright ownership itself – rather, copyright registration at or around the time of creation is discretionary with the copyright owner. Congress only requires copyright registration as a pre-condition to filing a lawsuit for copyright infringement – something that your entertainment lawyer litigator won’t miss when reviewing the statute pre-filing of the federal court lawsuit.

Second is a conflict of interest that may surface on hiring a lawyer who has a close association with the client’s competitor. Third, is to check for references for the lawyer that the artist is interested in hiring. This lawyer’s clientele should ideally consist of entertainment industry professionals/businesses with legal requirements that are similar to that of the artist in question. They should enquire about the lawyer’s responsiveness, level of involvement and dedication by asking relevant questions to his/her prior clients.

About the Author: Proven Step By Step Guide To Profit Online With Resale Rights. Visit

Proven Step By Step Guide To Profit Online With Resale Rights. Visit


Permanent Link:

Can You Teach Yourself Guitar?

Can You Teach Yourself Guitar?


Tom Freeman

The guitar is a magical instrument for many people. It can be fun to play and it elicits many emotions. That is because the guitar can produce rock and roll, country, blues, jazz and even classical music. There is really nothing the guitar can\’t do. In the right hands it is even a percussion instrument. This is probably why so many people want to learn to play the guitar. For some people it is natural to just sign up for lessons but others like to pick up the instrument and teach themselves how to play guitar. If you do try to learn guitar by yourself you should have a good source of instruction to turn to that will help you figure things out that you can\’t on your own. With the right instruction you can easily teach yourself to play guitar.

Learning a new instrument is fun but let\’s be honest the day you always remember is the day you get your first guitar. When you do look for an instrument remember that you don\’t have to spend a lot of money. But you do need to find a quality instrument in the sense that is has a good tone and it can be tuned properly. There is nothing worse than having to constantly tune your guitar instead of just learning to play it. There are tons of great values in the form of used guitars out there. There are also some very high quality, low priced new guitars on the market. Ask around to people you know and trust and find yourself a nice guitar. You are going to be using it for some time and you never forget your first guitar.

YouTube Preview Image

If you ask you will find that most so called self taught guitarists had some teaching or reference source as they learned to play. It may have been a friend or an old song book or some instruction they found laying around but they undoubtedly had something that inspired them. You should try to find a reliable source of instruction to help you learn how to use the guitar properly. When you teach yourself there will be times where you just get stuck and need help. This is where a teaching resource comes in handy. There is some very good, high quality instruction available to beginners and experts alike for that matter. Just look for something that you think can help you get started and stay motivated.

If you happen to be blessed with perfect pitch then you can probably tune your guitar without much assistance. If you have a good ear then over time you will probably get it right most of the time. However, most of us rely on tuning forks or today\’s electronic tuning devices to get our guitars tuned up. With all this technology available there really is no excuse anymore for playing an out of tune guitar. Get your top string tuned up and then the others follow quickly from that. A few of the better guitar courses talked about earlier do provide a tuning device as part of the instruction program. This alone usually makes the investment worthwhile because you will have to get a tuning device for your guitar.

If you want to learn more about how to

teach yourself guitar

check out this

Jamorama Review


Article Source: